Skip directly to content

Australia – 14,000 stolen children – today

Like us on fb

Lukes Dad's picture
on Sat, 05/31/2014 - 20:03
Fight Child Protection Department Corruption: 
Australia – 14,000 stolen children – today

Note: "The Children’s Court system is stacked against Aboriginal people." - Is this woman deaf & dumb!? Um... it's stacked against EVERY parent (and child).

"Aboriginals are removed from their families for much less..." - Oh, ok. So since our children were removed based on nearly nothing, what's less than nothing!?

"Towards the end of my time there..." - Ah, now see, here's where the truth comes out. She was quite happy destroying families while it meant raking in cash for herself. Now that she's leaving, the department is corrupt, biased, etc.

"We have no choice but to tell our people to bow down, to keep quiet... ... or they’ll be tarnished as ‘aggressive’." - Sorry, but there's no difference between white & black there. We're all told to sit down, shut up, let them take our children, in the hope they might come home.

“Why are kids being removed at record rates? It’s not because of neglect, it’s not because of a lack of love, it’s because they are seen as not assimilating.” - TRUE! (For all races.) Anything out of the ordinary is used against families.

It seems years of destroying families is absolved by speaking out only after you can't lose your job.

"It does not wash that I was only doing my job." - Hm... INDEED!

Marcus Bilstein


Former Government worker for the NSW Department of Families and Communities, Debra Swan on National Sorry Day joined one of the 15 protests happening across the continent to not only remember the Stolen Generations but to point out that they are continuing. In NSW, one in 9 Aboriginal children is ripped from their families into “out of home care”.

Bring Them Home! Heartbroken parents fighting for the return of their children

Ms Swan said, “I have seen the injustice, and how unfair this system is, with my own eyes.”

According to Ms Swan, “Too often, removals happen without any consultation. Parents come into the office frustrated and angry, as anyone would be after having their children ripped away from them.”

“They are then written off even further, branded ‘non-compliant’ or ‘aggressive’.”

“The Children’s Court system is stacked against Aboriginal people. I have seen too many solicitors who have no idea what they are doing, or just push our people to go along with the demands of the Department.”

“Parents are told that unless they agree to orders, they will be denied any access to their children.”

Stolen Generation, Forgotten Australians, Stolen Migrant Children, Forced Adoption Single Mothers

“Justice Woods did his Royal Commission into Child Protection and he said that Aboriginal are removed from their families for much less than what are non-Aboriginal children.”

“I have seen the biases, the discrimination, the prejudices, the drive to assimilate Aboriginal people. Towards the end of my time there, my eyes opened up to them and especially after I left I realised how they assimilate us, the Aboriginal workers.”

Children in care 'a new stolen generation'

“The Department may say it has cultural education of its staff but that is not true. What they really have is an ulterior white picket fence vision for everyone. They disregard the fact that Aboriginal cultures are not about white picket fences. They disregard our definitions of family. We are not into nuclear families with mum and dad alone at the top. In Aboriginal families there is the whole village, there are the mum and dad but also the aunties and uncles, the grannies and granddads.”

Audio news with Debra Swan here:

More audio news with Debra Swan here:

A Department of Child Protection worker in Perth, who is Aboriginal confided, “They do not even consult us as Aboriginal workers about Aboriginal families. They dismiss us, if we speak up we are shuffled out.”

“The Department is about their line, and their line is a about the White workers making all the calls. We, as Black workers are only in there to make up the numbers on the book, to cover their backs that there is equality, but there is not. Child Protection is racist, because it is all assimilation and doing as they say; you speak up as a worker and you’re out of line.”

“We have no choice but to tell our people to bow down, to keep quiet, to not piss off the White workers or they’ll be tarnished as ‘aggressive’.  That they will lose all hope of being with their children. And the Childrens Court doesn’t listen to families, only to the White workers and the DCP legal team who treat kids and families like they’re a dime a dozen.”

“Why are kids being removed at record rates? It’s not because of neglect, it’s not because of a lack of love, it’s because they are seen as not assimilating.”

But many First Peoples live culturally different lives to the rest of the Australian population. There are effectively two cultural systems on this continent – Western-based cultures and First Peoples-based cultures and they clash, that is where the majority Western-based cultures attempt to dominate them and demand assimilation.

Indigenous Social Justice Association President, Ray Jackson was himself a removed child during the Second World War. “My White father was killed on the Kokoda Trail and instead of my Aboriginal mother being supported with a war pension, her reward was to have me taken away from her.”

“The pain of being removed never leaves you, not for the child or the parent.”

Mr Jackson, like Ms Swan, argues that there are two different cultural systems on this continent that can coexist but that the Western-based cultural majority does not let this happen and instead pushes its assimilation.

“They push on us the white picket fence, well our culture does not care about a white picket fence. Child Protection workers do not look at whether there’s love in the family or respect for one another, or how to help a family that needs a helping hand.”

“Child Protection workers come into homes and judge hygiene by how polished a home is, well it’s not our way to be slaves to how shiny a home should be.”

“They look at whether the children are wearing shoes, and if they’re not then they jot on their report sheets that they are not taken care of; well we may like to be barefoot as often as we can. But if they’ve got a problem with shoes, and we don’t have shoes, well don’t take away the children, just bloody well give them a pair of shoes,” said Mr Jackson.

University of Sydney Technology Jumbunna House senior researcher, Paddy Gibson, now living in the Northern Territory, is angry that more Aboriginal children have been removed from their families today than at any time in Australia’s history.

The Northern Territory Children Commissioner’s annual report showed that in the year to June 30, 2013, more than five times more Aboriginal children than non-Aboriginal children were removed from their families. Mr Gibson said that the predominant reason given for this was ‘neglect’, not physical or sexual abuse. But as a researcher myself, I have long argued that the ‘neglect’ has to be articulated. What do they mean by ‘neglect’?

Mr Gibson said that “too often we are seeing Aboriginal cultural practices themselves being classified as neglect.” In other words their Aboriginality is being held against them, their historical and cultural identities are liabilities.

Mr Gibson said that it costs up to $300 per night to keep a single child in care but that this is misspending when funds could have been diverted to families to relieve impoverishment.

Northern Territorian Elder Barbara Shaw said, “There are strong Aboriginal people in all communities who badly need resources and support to help deal with the issues facing our families and to keep our kids safe in their culture.”

“We are all part of extended kinship networks. There is always somewhere they can turn without removing children, but resources and support need to be on the table.”

In the Northern Territory, 70 per cent of the children removed from their families are placed with non-Aboriginal families, usually hundreds of kilometres away, making it near impossible for reunification. And there are those who have said that many of these children are being taken by families who they themselves do it for the quid on offer, and for the effective indenture of the children as domestics. These claims need to be investigated.

“People need to come forward and tell their stories, so Australia at large can feel the effect of what is happening to the families that are being destroyed, the families that are disempowered. I urge everyone to come forward despite that they may feel they will be threatened further by the Department,” said Gunnedah Grandmother, Auntie Hazel Collins.

Audio news with Auntie Hazel Collins here:

More audio news with Auntie Hazel Collins here:

Some believe that a class action by thousands of families will be the only way forward, to shift our not so bright parliamentarians into action, to put in place legislation that restricts the Child Protection agencies from ripping children from their families other than for reasons of obvious physical violence and life-threatening neglect, not because of hearsay, or because parents were angry when confronted by Child Protection – not because of non-compliance, and not because they do not wear shoes. Poverty must never be used to condemn families as criminals nor should the rejection of a Western-based culture be judged as a crime.

The Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuses by Churches and Orphanages is dealing with less victims than would a Royal Commission into Child Protection – which would be dealing with nearly 100,000 victims since 1930 to today, children ruthlessly stolen from their parents, many from the delivery table of hospital birth rooms. More children have been removed in the last year than there are victims before the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuses. The trauma of the Sexual Abuses victims is heart-wrenching and for far too many irreparable. Imagine then the numbers of victims, the children removed from families, today, the trauma, the multiple trauma, the irreparable damage. Who is responsible? The Australian Government is – and they should be indicted. But if the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuses is anything to go by, an effectively impotent exercise, then there is no light in sight at the end of the tunnel for the victims of this generation of stealing.

On Sorry Day, many gathered around the nation to protest and call for an end to the stealing of children. In Brisbane, the Department of Child Protection closed its offices for the day because of the protest on its steps. In Sydney, the Department of Families and Communities kept its workers inside, not a whimper as the rally lasted more than two hours on its steps. In the capital of Australia’s backwater of racism, Perth, a protest took place outside the Department of Child Protection. A delegation from the rally met with the Department of Child Protection. Police were called in when the protesters ceremonially danced out the front – unbelievably police arrested three of the protesters, who included organisers of the rally, Vanessa Culbong and Len Culbong. How sickening to arrest people calling for an end to child removals. The police did not have to do this, but they did. It does not wash that “I was only doing my job.”

The racism that is Australian born and bred cannot be allowed to continue – a racism that now sees one in every two Aboriginal children in Queensland known to the Department of Child Protection. More Queensland Aboriginal children are in the custody of the State today than were removed between 1908 to 1971.

One protester said, “My grandmother and her sisters were taken in the 1930s, her daughter, my mother was taken, then they took me from my mum, now they have taken my children. I never did anything wrong. I love my children. They screamed when they took them.”

by Gerry Georgatos

Comments

Lukes Dad's picture

The over-representation of Aboriginal children in foster care has nothing to do with race, the Northern Territory attorney-general says.

A senior researcher with the Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning at UTS, Paddy Gibson, said on Tuesday that Aboriginal families who lived a traditional lifestyle were being punished with the removal of their children in "a new stolen generation".

He said cultural practices such as long-term travel and overcrowding in homes when family visited were being construed by child protection services as neglectful and abusive of children.

However, NT Attorney-General and Minister for Children John Elferink said that assertion was "fanciful".

"It's more about strapping on a black armband than it is about the reality of child protection," he told AAP on Wednesday.

"To simply say an Aboriginal practice is something we target is misleading and inflammatory. If there is an Aboriginal practice that does constitute neglect, then, quite frankly, the human right of that child will come ahead of the cultural right."

As of June 30, 2013, there were five times more Aboriginal children (624) than non-Aboriginal children (126) in care, the NT Children's Commissioner's annual report shows, and while the number of non-Aboriginal children has plateaued, the number of Aboriginal children is rising.

Mr Elferink said it was not about race but due to the over-representation of Aboriginal people on welfare or in jail as a result of a federal reliance on welfare.

"(Welfare) says to its recipients, 'You are useless' ... That is entirely the wrong signal to send to any human being, irrespective of their cultural background."

The government was not overly intervening in cases of Aboriginal children in care, he said.

"Government does not make a good parent; institutions generally don't make good parents. They are the lesser of a number of evils," Mr Elferink said.

"We have generated in recent years this nebulous concept that somehow government can make children happy and give them normal lives, but what we are doing is protecting their fundamental human rights and we are flat-strapped doing that. We certainly don't need or desire to go out and drum up extra business."

Neda Vanovac

AAP

Lukes Dad's picture

But on the other hand, I see the NT Attorney-General and Minister for Children John Elferink saying:

"To simply say an Aboriginal practice is something we target is misleading and inflammatory. If there is an Aboriginal practice that does constitute n
eglect, then, quite frankly, the human right of that child will come ahead of the cultural right."

Um, right. So you're in government and you get to decide (according to your own cultural practices) which cultural practices of others are considered neglect... But he says it's misleading to say he's targeting their culture!?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

So their aboriginal practices won't be used to take their children, as long as they practice white cultural practices instead. Hm...

Marcus Bilstein